Science journalism is meant to cast a critical eye upon science, but science is now casting an increasingly critical eye upon itself. Retractions are on the rise, post-publication peer review dismantles high-profile papers within weeks of airing, and several studies in psychology and medicine have uncovered a startling prevalence of irreproducible results and hidden data. This panel explored the growing movement to improve the practice of science, and how it affects science journalism. 

Chair

James Randerson, Assistant News Editor, The Guardian

Panel

Ivan Oransky, vice president and global editorial director of MedPage Today.  Writer of the blogs Embargo Watch and Retraction Watch

Ben Goldacre, physician, academic and science writer

Chris Chambers, senior research fellow in cognitive neuroscience at the school of psychology, Cardiff University. Science writer.

Deborah Cohen, Investigations Editor, BMJ.

Session Video

Session Audio


Download the recording here.

Session Review

Matthew Gwynfryn Thomas and Menorca Chaturvedi review the session.

Session Slides

Ivan Oransky Session Slides